Is teaching expertise really necessary for an academic career?
Young scientists often get contradictory advice whether they need teaching expertise to become a professor or not. Every university will confirm that teaching is the core expertise of a professor, however, successful researchers may see teaching as a waste of time and unimportant to get a position.
The experiences are mixed!
There is a lot of contradictory advice because the experiences are very mixed dependent on the country, the university, the faculty and specific positions. There seems to be a tendency that smaller and regional universities value teaching more, while the bigger and more prestigious universities focus more on excellence in research. It is always a complex decision to choose for a smaller or a bigger university. Read more here: Should I choose a big or a small university?
Every university will strongly state that teaching is the core task of a university and it’s professors and every university will promote the best lecturer of the year on their website. However, most universities will also underline that a professor has to be excellent in research as well.
Excellent teaching will probably not compensate a weak publication list
If professors are selected they often have to give a test lecture to show that they know how to teach. Often this is more a formality, especially when a candidate has an excellent publication list and big grants. There is also considerable doubt whether one single test lecture which may be prepared for months is representative of the teaching expertise of the candidate.
However, excellent teaching qualifications, fantastic student evaluations and prizes as best lecturer of the university may substantially help to improve your profile – but these attributes will probably not compensate a weak publication list. Read more here: Do I need nature or science papers for a successful career in science?
Excellent research without teaching skills may lead to a professor position.
In most universities in the Western world the following is true: If you have a great publication list and big grants nobody cares about your teaching expertise!
In such a case only a minimal level of teaching skills has to be demonstrated. But – and this is a big but – an excellent candidate may be “killed” by a member of the selection jury if there is a considerable lack or absence of teaching expertise. Many universities also include student representatives in the selection juries who are eager to choose a candidate who is not completely unexperienced in teaching.
If a university has to choose between either candidates who have a great publication list or candidates who have primarily great teaching expertise, the better publication list may be the winning asset. It is also possible that the vacancy is closed without a candidate and opened again to find a candidate who has both qualifications (research & teaching).
Specialized or expert teaching skills may lead to a professor position.
There are positions which include substantial teaching tasks e. g. in anatomy. These positions are great for persons who are specialized in that niche. Specialists may beat even persons with a much better publication list if the university desperately needs somebody to take over a heavy package of specific lectures and courses.
“Pure” teaching professorships are rare
In rare cases, there are professor positions which focus exclusively on teaching. In selected domains such as anatomy or biophysics, the teaching expertise may be so specialized that it cannot easily be added to the tasks of another poor colleague in the department.
In these cases, pure teaching professor positions may be opened, but often they are only part-time. They also may have limited career opportunities if the performance over the years is benchmarked with professors who do research. These positions may be explicitly limited to grow only to a defined level such as assistant professor because for higher levels (associate or full professor) good or excellent research output is demanded.
If you want to become a professor, make a clear career decision!
To prepare well for a career as a professor in science, you must decide which type of career path you want to follow. There are two extremes in het spectrum of possible academic careers: either you focus on becoming a “High impact factor professor” or a “Specialist professor”.
If you decide to become a “High impact factor professor” it is – no surprise – essential to aim at very high impact factors. The advantage is that you can plan your career, go to an excellent lab and focus on publishing very high. The disadvantage is that there is a lot of competition and acceptance of your publications in high impact journals can be very unpredictable.
On the other end of the spectrum you find the “Specialist professor”. These experts have to ‘juggle’ their teaching specialization (for example as an anatomist) on the one hand and their publication track record on the other. The advantage is that the competition is much more limited.
The disadvantage is that the specialization in teaching and the topic in research may be unrelated (= you teach in one field and do research in a completely different field). It may be an internal struggle to prepare well for teaching and reduce the time and effort for research or the other way round.
Here are some guidelines on how to find your dream job in science : The 8 best tips to find your dream job in science
Is teaching expertise necessary to BE a professor?
Finally, I want to emphasize that you may not be the best lecturer in the world to get selected by a selection committee and become a professor – but to do the job you definitely need teaching skills for the following reasons.
- Most professors spend a considerable part of their working time on teaching activities.
- It is embarrassing to give bad lectures and receive negative feedback and complaints from the students and teaching representatives of the university.
- In many universities teaching performance is monitored for example via student surveys and evaluation forms and may have an effect on future promotions.
Thus, you may become a professor without sufficient teaching expertise, but you will need teaching skills to be a professor and to do your job well.
The following articles may also interest you:
- Is being a professor worth it?
- Should I Become A Professor? Success Rate 3 %!
- Should I admit that I want to become a professor?
- How to become a professor?
- How to become an expert in your scientific field?
- Do postdocs need leadership skills?
- 15 essential leadership skills for a career in science
- For how long should I be a postdoc?
- Should I quit my postdoc?
- Job interview outfits in science – what to wear?